🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned discussion over their destiny often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the federal government disallowed the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities pays for the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and social skills indicate they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker observed first-hand.

She spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a position that entailed gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their personalities. She cultivated a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.

“One whale chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both transformed the way I view bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a context of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, died. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand results of the closure. “Concrete is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but previously claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality health care and 24/7 supervision than any individual in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in the spring following the death of Eos, an unwell beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the facility believed information of the incident were shared to the press and she was released not long after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in despair. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be taken immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a request to send the whales to China.

“To approve the application would have meant a ongoing life in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals are meant for the wild, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience permit an relocation that would prolong the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks reflect a wider incorrect perception of the circumstances of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers attempt to find a solution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of food for Inuit communities.

A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which has received government approval, has proven most controversial. The future site, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could in time represent a sustainable resolution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the prospect of a refuge indicates a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, leader of the sanctuary project, said the facility will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|